A quick memo to a lot of people who envision themselves bravely crossing a line:
You aren't.
Yes, we know it's sad and a little bewildering... we know you are not the sort of person to find yourself in a place like this... we know you have been voting as a Democrat since 1964, or 1932... or last week, and this is just all so sudden... but enough already.
You are not a brave warrior, or a fearsome cat. Your party did not leave you. When some 90% of Democrats have decided they can vote for the Democratic nominee for President, you are the one with the problem. You have decided to vote Republican. That's fine. It's your vote, and it's your choice.
Just don't keep telling us how wonderfully sad and concerned you are. We appreciate your concerns, honest we do... but when you can say "I've thought it over and as a Democrat, I must vote for john McCain" you have kind of given away your credibility as an analyst of what ails the Democratic Party. Whatever it is that you've discovered... it usually goes with being a Republican. There's nothing wrong with that. Be it. Own it. For God's sake, commit to something. If you're sad about becoming a Republican... well, yes. It is kind of sad, isn't it? And need we underline it by saying that those who have chosen the other route - the Kathleen Parkers and Peggy Noonans, Chuck Hagels and Dick Lugars and Colin Powells - are not sad. They are angry with their party, and they are relieved to know that there's another choice.
Yes, we know: Sarah Palin has been mistreated, by Republicans and Democrats alike. She has not been taken seriously, and now that whole clothes flap just subjects her to sexism of the worst sort. Okay, well kind of... but kind of not, when one asks, mildly, if perhaps $150,000 is excessive, however well one might need to look. You are welcome to cast Palin as a feminist icon... but feminism isn't just being any woman who comes down the pike (where would you be, if McCain had picked Kay Bailey Hutchinson... and where were you when people were pointing out that Hutchinson, an eminently qualified woman, felt undersppreciated and disrespected at the selection of a younger, less qualified woman?). You may get to be "feminist" when you claim to be... but that still means that feminism stands for something, something beyond just being a woman in a prminent position.
And furthermore, you cannot just explain away major differences with one sentence dismissals. "I disagree with Sara Palin on social issues" suggests that you have arguments over who to invite to dinner; "I differ with her aniti-choice stance on a woman's right to consult with her doctor about having an abortion" is an altogether different, larger, and far more crucial issue. And, it seems to us, the kind of issue that would keep you from voting for the, um, anti-choice, Roe overturning, judge selecting pair in this process.
Look, when Zell Miller said his principles forced him to turn Republican, say terrible things about Max Cleland, and generally give away his credibility... that did not ennoble him. It has done nothing for Joe Lieberman to wander around, sonorously declaring that it pains him to be so at odds with his own party. There are two different political parties. There are actual political differences. You are not going to get to pretend that they do not exist. Nor, if you repeat foolish suggestions like "Obama will raise taxes on people like Joe the Plumber" do you get to claim some specuial insight into the political system the rest of us do not share. You are just repeating talking points. And, one might add, intentionally incorrect ones, at that.
No, it does not make one "racist" to vote for someone other than Barack Obama; but it does not make you maverick, or especially insightful to support John McCain, as a Democrat. Not at this late date. Not after the lackluster campaign, the poorly articulated positions... positions that, under any close examination tend to fall apart. The best case for John McCain is a negative, rejectionist, appeal against nearly every concept - from women's basic rights to fairness and economic justice to peaceful diplomatic engagement with others in the world - that Democrats support and believe in. There are alternatives to both candidates; you have not chosen them. There are ways to criticize that which Obama needs to do better without rejecting him outright; you have not made that choice. This is no longer about Hillary Clinton - Mrs. Clinton has, comfortably and enthusiastically, made the case for Barack Obama for months. Those of us who supported her then, and support Obama now, are not "drinking the KoolAid"... we are simply Democrats, and Barack Obama is our candidate, too.
But mostly, this is not about you. This is about all of us. Just as it always has been. And when you know that, feel free to come back. We'll still be here.
Recent Comments